Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from a polarized scenario in Brazil.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led many countries to adopt strict measures aimed at reducing circulation of the virus and mitigating the burden on health services. Among these, the lockdown (social distancing/confinement) was probably the most controversial and most widely debated, since it affected the population's daily life abruptly, with consequences for people's emotional state and the operational logic of various economic sectors. Objective: Analyze the relationship been Brazilians' opinions on lockdown during the pandemic and individual, sociodemographic, and belief characteristics. Methods: We conducted an online survey to evaluate Brazilians' opinions on the lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic. We prepared a questionnaire with questions on sociodemographic aspects and individuals' points of view toward the lockdown. We sent a link for the survey through social media and encouraged participants to also share the link in their respective social networks, as a snowball sample. Cluster analysis was performed to identify different opinion profiles. Cluster Analysis is a multivariate approach that aims to segment a set of data into distinct groups, using some classification criteria. Results: From April to May 2021, the link received 33,796 free participations via social networks from all over Brazil. We analyzed data from 33,363 participants. Pro-lockdown opinions predominated in most of the sociodemographic strata. Cluster analysis identified two groups: pro-lockdown, aligned with the scientific recommendations, and anti-lockdown, characterized by economic insecurity and denialism. Anti-lockdown participants downplayed the pandemic's seriousness and believed in unproven measures to fight SARS-CoV-2. However, these same participants were afraid of losing their jobs and of being unable to pay their bills. In general, participants did not believe in the feasibility of a lockdown in Brazil or in the efficacy of the prevailing government administration's measures. Conclusion: The study identified a lack of consensus among participants concerning lockdown as a practice. Issues such as disbelief in the pandemic's seriousness, denialism, and economic insecurity were important in the determination of the profiles identified in the study. Denialism is believed to have been a subjective defense against the economic problems resulting from social control measures and the lack of adequate social policies to deal with the pandemic. It was also highlighted that political polarization and the lack of central coordination during social distancing are crucial aspects. The variation in results in different locations highlights the diversity of the Brazilian scenario. By analyzing Brazilians' opinions about the lockdown, considering individual characteristics, the study seeks insights to face the pandemic and prepare for future crises, contributing to more effective public health strategies.

[Online survey on the reasons for vaccine hesitancy against COVID-19 in children and adolescents in Brazil]. / Inquérito online sobre os motivos para hesitação vacinal contra a COVID-19 em crianças e adolescentes do Brasil.

The objective is to unveil the reasons for vaccine hesitancy among parents and/or guardians of children and adolescents toward the prevention of COVID-19. This is a descriptive study, with a qualitative approach that seeks to analyze the answers to the open question "Why will you not vaccinate or have not vaccinated or are in doubt about vaccinating the children and adolescents under your responsibility, for the prevention of COVID-19?". The research included adult individuals, Brazilians, living in the country, responsible for children and adolescents under 18 years of age. Data collection took place electronically in November and December 2021. The answers were organized and processed with the support of the software Iramuteq. The textual corpus of this research was composed of the response of 1,896 participants, consisting of 87% who were hesitant (1,650) and 13% (246) of parents who intend to vaccinate but who outlined some doubts and considerations about the vaccination of children and adolescents. These are reasons why parents and/or guardians have not vaccinated or are in doubt about vaccinating the children and adolescents under their responsibility for the prevention of COVID-19: fears about vaccination regarding the conception that the vaccine is in the experimental phase, fear of adverse reactions and long-term effects. The reasons for the lack of intention to vaccinate stem from the understanding of the participants that COVID-19 in children is not serious, the risks of vaccination are greater than the benefits, and the right of choice not to vaccinate.

Objetiva-se desvelar os motivos para hesitação vacinal de pais e/ou responsáveis de crianças e adolescentes para prevenção da COVID-19. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, de abordagem qualitativa, que busca analisar as respostas da pergunta aberta "por que você não vai vacinar, não vacinou ou está na dúvida em vacinar as crianças e os adolescentes sob sua responsabilidade para prevenção da COVID-19?". A pesquisa incluiu indivíduos adultos, brasileiros, residentes no país, responsáveis por crianças e adolescentes menores de 18 anos. A coleta de dados aconteceu de forma eletrônica entre os meses de novembro e dezembro de 2021. As respostas foram organizadas e processadas com suporte do software Iramuteq. O corpus textual desta pesquisa foi composto pela resposta de 1.896 participantes, constituído por 87% de hesitantes (1.650) e 13% (246) de pais que têm intenção de vacinar, mas que esboçaram algumas dúvidas e considerações a respeito da vacinação de crianças e adolescentes. São motivos pelos quais pais e/ou responsáveis não vacinaram ou estão na dúvida em vacinar as crianças e os adolescentes sob sua responsabilidade para prevenção da COVID-19: receio em razão de a vacina estar em fase experimental e medo das reações adversas e dos efeitos a longo prazo. Já os motivos para ausência de intenção de vacinar decorrem dos entendimentos dos participantes de que a COVID-19 em crianças não é grave, os riscos da vacinação são maiores do que os benefícios e o direito de escolha em não vacinar.

El objetivo es revelar los motivos de la indecisión a las vacunas de padres y/o responsables de niños y adolescentes para la prevención de COVID-19. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo con enfoque cualitativo, que busca analizar las respuestas a la pregunta abierta "¿Por qué no va a vacunar o no vacunó o tiene dudas en vacunar a los niños y los adolescentes bajo su responsabilidad para la prevención del COVID-19?". La investigación incluyó individuos adultos, brasileños, residentes en el país, responsables de niños y adolescentes menores de 18 años. La recolección de datos se realizó de forma electrónica entre los meses de noviembre y diciembre de 2021. Las respuestas se organizaron y procesaron con ayuda del software Iramuteq. El corpus textual de esta investigación fue compuesto por la respuesta de 1.896 participantes, siendo constituido por el 87% de indecisos (1.650) y el 13% (246) de padres que tienen la intención de vacunar, pero que esbozaron algunas dudas y consideraciones respecto a la vacunación de niños y adolescentes. Son motivos por los cuales los padres y/o responsables no vacunaron o están en duda en vacunar a los niños y adolescentes bajo su responsabilidad para prevención del COVID-19: temores con la vacunación en cuanto a la concepción de que la vacuna está en fase experimental, miedo a las reacciones adversas y los efectos a largo plazo. Los motivos de la ausencia de intención en vacunar se deben a que los participantes entienden que el COVID-19 en niños no es grave, que los riesgos de la vacunación son mayores que los beneficios y que tienen derecho a decidir no vacunarse.

Look, you are (not) alone: circulating gift and the mental health of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. / Olha, você (não) está sozinho: a circulação da dádiva e a saúde mental de profissionais de saúde durante a pandemia de COVID-19.

The mental health of health professionals who worked directly in services during the COVID-19 pandemic to care for patients affected by the disease became a fundamental issue to be considered, given the several consequences of this activity for these professionals. This article aimed to understand the challenges and demands of health professionals concerning support to address the emotional and physical exhaustion of working on the so-called frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic. The qualitative methodological approach was based on semi-structured interviews conducted online with these professionals after the first months of the pandemic. The hero's place in which they were set, even if only in media discourses, soon gave way to their weaknesses and fragile work relationships to emerge: stress, fear, and the listening and reception desire. Marcel Mauss' gift theory was brought up considering that new ways of reading and interpreting health work relationships contribute to necessary and urgent reformulations of their current context, targeting mental health and, more broadly, the comprehensive health of healthcare professionals.

Durante a pandemia de COVID-19, a saúde mental dos profissionais de saúde, que trabalharam diretamente nos serviços voltados para o cuidado dos pacientes afetados pela doença, tornou-se questão fundamental a ser considerada, dado os diversos desdobramentos que essa atuação gerou para esses profissionais. O objetivo deste artigo foi compreender desafios e demandas dos profissionais de saúde em termos de suporte para lidar com o desgaste emocional e físico com a atuação na chamada linha de frente durante a pandemia de COVID-19. A abordagem metodológica qualitativa se deu a partir de entrevistas semiestruturadas realizadas em ambiente online com esses profissionais, passados os primeiros meses de pandemia. O lugar de herói em que eles foram colocados, ainda que apenas nos discursos midiáticos, logo deu espaço para que as fragilidades destes e das relações de trabalho aparecessem: estresse, medo e o desejo de escuta e acolhimento. A teoria da dádiva de Marcel Mauss foi trazida considerando que novas formas de leitura e interpretação das relações de trabalho em saúde contribuem para reformulações necessárias e urgentes do contexto em que se encontram hoje, visando a saúde mental e, mais amplamente, a saúde integral dos profissionais da área de saúde.

Olha, você (não) está sozinho: a circulação da dádiva e a saúde mental de profissionais de saúde durante a pandemia de COVID-19 / Look, you are (not) alone: circulating gift and the mental health of healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic

Resumo Durante a pandemia de COVID-19, a saúde mental dos profissionais de saúde, que trabalharam diretamente nos serviços voltados para o cuidado dos pacientes afetados pela doença, tornou-se questão fundamental a ser considerada, dado os diversos desdobramentos que essa atuação gerou para esses profissionais. O objetivo deste artigo foi compreender desafios e demandas dos profissionais de saúde em termos de suporte para lidar com o desgaste emocional e físico com a atuação na chamada linha de frente durante a pandemia de COVID-19. A abordagem metodológica qualitativa se deu a partir de entrevistas semiestruturadas realizadas em ambiente online com esses profissionais, passados os primeiros meses de pandemia. O lugar de herói em que eles foram colocados, ainda que apenas nos discursos midiáticos, logo deu espaço para que as fragilidades destes e das relações de trabalho aparecessem: estresse, medo e o desejo de escuta e acolhimento. A teoria da dádiva de Marcel Mauss foi trazida considerando que novas formas de leitura e interpretação das relações de trabalho em saúde contribuem para reformulações necessárias e urgentes do contexto em que se encontram hoje, visando a saúde mental e, mais amplamente, a saúde integral dos profissionais da área de saúde.

Abstract The mental health of health professionals who worked directly in services during the COVID-19 pandemic to care for patients affected by the disease became a fundamental issue to be considered, given the several consequences of this activity for these professionals. This article aimed to understand the challenges and demands of health professionals concerning support to address the emotional and physical exhaustion of working on the so-called frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic. The qualitative methodological approach was based on semi-structured interviews conducted online with these professionals after the first months of the pandemic. The hero's place in which they were set, even if only in media discourses, soon gave way to their weaknesses and fragile work relationships to emerge: stress, fear, and the listening and reception desire. Marcel Mauss' gift theory was brought up considering that new ways of reading and interpreting health work relationships contribute to necessary and urgent reformulations of their current context, targeting mental health and, more broadly, the comprehensive health of healthcare professionals.

Social Representations of Hesitant Brazilians about Vaccination against COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The control of the COVID-19 pandemic has been a great challenge. Understanding the thoughts and beliefs underlying vaccine hesitancy can help in the formulation of public policies. The present study aimed to analyze the social representations of hesitant Brazilians about vaccination against COVID-19. METHODS: Qualitative research guided by the Theory of Social Representations, carried out through an online survey among Brazilian adults living in Brazil. The data were analyzed using the IRaMuTeQ software. RESULTS: Of the 173,178 respondents, 10,928 were hesitant and declared reasons for vaccination hesitation. The analysis generated three classes: mistrust of the vaccine and underestimation of the severity of the pandemic; (dis)information and distrust of political involvement; and fear of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Social knowledge, presented by the representations apprehended in this study, demonstrates difficulty in discerning the reliability of information and a social imagination full of doubts and uncertainties. Understanding the internal dynamics of these groups, with their representations of the world, is important to propose policies and actions that echo and cause changes in the understanding of the role of immunization. It is essential to shed light on the sociological imagination so that gaps filled with false information can be dismantled and confronted with scientific knowledge accessible to the population.

Trustworthiness of information sources on vaccines for COVID-19 prevention among Brazilians.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the trustworthiness of information sources, perception of clear information about the vaccine, and strategies to increase adherence to vaccination to provide managers with information that helps establish effective communication with the population about vaccination. METHOD: This is an online survey conducted between January 22 and 29, 2021, preceded by an Informed Consent, that aims to assess vaccine hesitancy, which corresponded to the first week of vaccination initiation to prevent COVID-19 in Brazil. Data were obtained from a questionnaire made available through a free platform and stored in Google Forms and later exported to the SPSS statistical package for analysis. The sample consisted of all questionnaires from participants who self-declared as age 18 or older, Brazilian, and residing in Brazil at the time of the survey. Incomplete records with more than 50% of blank items and duplicates were excluded. All categorical variables were analyzed from their absolute and relative frequencies. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to verify the relationship between dependent variables and independent variables. RESULTS: The results show that trust in information sources diverges between hesitant and non-hesitant. They also showed that some participants show an overall distrust that seems to have deeper foundations than issues related only to the source of information. The high rejection of television and the WHO as sources of information among hesitant suggests that integrated actions with research institutes, public figures vaccinating, and religious leaders can help to combat vaccine hesitation. Two actors become particularly important in this dynamic, both for good and bad, and their anti-vaxxer behavior must be observed: the doctor and the Ministry of Health. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to gathering valuable information to help understand the behavior and thinking relevant to the adherence to vaccination recommendations.

Usefulness of the Hospital Information System for maternal mortality surveillance in Brazil. / Utilidade do Sistema de Informação Hospitalar na vigilância da mortalidade materna no Brasil.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the capability of hospital records in the Hospital Information System (SIH) to add valuable and complementary information to the Mortality Information System (SIM) in studies on maternal mortality. We calculated and compared the maternal mortality ratio from the SIH and SIM databases, by age group and region, to highlight differences between groups and assess the coverage of maternal deaths using SIH compared with SIM. METHODS: Obstetric hospitalizations were defined based on three sources (codes ICD-10 in diagnoses; procedures; billing information). Hospital and SIM mortality ratios were calculated by dividing maternal deaths in hospitals affiliated to the Unified Brazilian Health System (SUS) per live births (SINASC) in the same hospitals. RESULTS: In 2019, we identified 2,497,957 obstetric admissions, 0.04% (946) with in-hospital mortality as outcome. The presence of three criteria identified 98% of obstetric hospitalizations and 83% of obstetric hospitalizations with death as outcome. The comparison of mortality ratios between SIH (45.5 MMR; 95%CI 42.7 - 48.5) and SIM (49.7 MMR; 95%CI 46.7 - 52.8) was not statistically significant (p-value: 0.053). CONCLUSION: The analysis of SIH was able to provide additional information for the monitoring and surveillance of maternal health in Brazil. Although there are differences between the mortality rates, the SIH, as a complementary information system to the SIM, may be valid in studies on maternal mortality and morbidity.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a capacidade dos registros hospitalares (SIH) em adicionar informações úteis e complementares ao Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade (SIM) no entendimento da mortalidade materna. Calcular e comparar a Razão de Mortalidade Materna (RMM) hospitalar e a RMM do SIM dos óbitos maternos ocorridos em hospitais, por faixa etária e por região, para demonstrar diferenças entre os grupos e avaliar a cobertura de óbitos maternos do SIM em relação ao SIH. MÉTODOS: As internações obstétricas foram definidas com base em três critérios (códigos da 10a Revisão da Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde ­ CID-10 nos diagnósticos; procedimentos; cobrança de parto). As RMM hospitalar e do SIM foram calculadas dividindo-se os óbitos maternos ocorridos nos hospitais conveniados ao Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) pelos nascidos vivos (Sistema de Informação sobre Nascidos Vivos ­ SINASC) desses estabelecimentos. RESULTADOS: Em 2019, identificamos 2.497.957 registros de internações obstétricas, 0,04% (946) com óbito hospitalar. Os três critérios localizaram 98% das internações obstétricas e 83% das internações com óbitos, revelando inconsistências entre diagnósticos e procedimentos. A comparação entre a RMM do SIH (45,5, intervalo de confiança ­ IC95%, 42,7­48,5) e a do SIM (49,7, IC95%, 46,7­52,8) não foi estatisticamente significante (p-valor 0,053). CONCLUSÃO: A análise do SIH foi capaz de prover informações adicionais ao monitoramento e vigilância da saúde materna no Brasil. Embora haja diferenças entre as RMM, o SIH como sistema de informação complementar ao SIM pode ser válido nos estudos sobre mortalidade e morbidade materna.

Willingness of Brazilian caregivers in having their children and adolescents vaccinated against Covid-19.

BACKGROUND: The vaccination of children and adolescents for the prevention of Covid-19 is important to:decrease in deaths and hospitalizations, prevent multisystem inflammatory syndrome, avoid long-term complications and decrease the suspension of on-site classes. Despite of these benefits, some studies have shown that some caregivers are still hesitancy. METHODS: This is a voluntary and anonymous online survey conducted from November 17 to December 14, 2021, in Brazil, through a free-of-charge platform with a link provided on social networks. A bivariate analysis was conducted with the independent variables, with vaccine hesitancy as the outcome variable, and a multivariate logistic model was used to calculated adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: The sample included 15,297 respondents. Approximately 13.3 % (2,028) of the caregivers were hesitant to vaccinate their children and adolescents against Covid-19 in at least one age group. The vaccination hesitanty rate of caregivers of children aged 0-4 years, 5-11 years and adolescents were 16 %, 13 %, 15 %, respectively. The principal factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were the following: belief that they need to wait longer, belief that children that had natural infection doesn't need to vaccinate and belief that vaccine has long term adverse effects. INTERPRETATION: The present study showed that the willingness of caregivers to have their children and adolescents vaccinated in Brazil is high compared to data from adult and pediatric international studies. This study provides a profile of the hesitant caregivers considering their perspectives and beliefs regarding vaccines that can help the elaboration of strategies to increase vaccine adherence.

Utilidade do Sistema de Informação Hospitalar na vigilância da mortalidade materna no Brasil / Usefulness of the Hospital Information System for maternal mortality surveillance in Brazil

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a capacidade dos registros hospitalares (SIH) em adicionar informações úteis e complementares ao Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade (SIM) no entendimento da mortalidade materna. Calcular e comparar a Razão de Mortalidade Materna (RMM) hospitalar e a RMM do SIM dos óbitos maternos ocorridos em hospitais, por faixa etária e por região, para demonstrar diferenças entre os grupos e avaliar a cobertura de óbitos maternos do SIM em relação ao SIH. Métodos: As internações obstétricas foram definidas com base em três critérios (códigos da 10a Revisão da Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde — CID-10 nos diagnósticos; procedimentos; cobrança de parto). As RMM hospitalar e do SIM foram calculadas dividindo-se os óbitos maternos ocorridos nos hospitais conveniados ao Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) pelos nascidos vivos (Sistema de Informação sobre Nascidos Vivos — SINASC) desses estabelecimentos. Resultados: Em 2019, identificamos 2.497.957 registros de internações obstétricas, 0,04% (946) com óbito hospitalar. Os três critérios localizaram 98% das internações obstétricas e 83% das internações com óbitos, revelando inconsistências entre diagnósticos e procedimentos. A comparação entre a RMM do SIH (45,5, intervalo de confiança — IC95%, 42,7-48,5) e a do SIM (49,7, IC95%, 46,7-52,8) não foi estatisticamente significante (p-valor 0,053). Conclusão: A análise do SIH foi capaz de prover informações adicionais ao monitoramento e vigilância da saúde materna no Brasil. Embora haja diferenças entre as RMM, o SIH como sistema de informação complementar ao SIM pode ser válido nos estudos sobre mortalidade e morbidade materna.

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the capability of hospital records in the Hospital Information System (SIH) to add valuable and complementary information to the Mortality Information System (SIM) in studies on maternal mortality. We calculated and compared the maternal mortality ratio from the SIH and SIM databases, by age group and region, to highlight differences between groups and assess the coverage of maternal deaths using SIH compared with SIM. Methods: Obstetric hospitalizations were defined based on three sources (codes ICD-10 in diagnoses; procedures; billing information). Hospital and SIM mortality ratios were calculated by dividing maternal deaths in hospitals affiliated to the Unified Brazilian Health System (SUS) per live births (SINASC) in the same hospitals. Results: In 2019, we identified 2,497,957 obstetric admissions, 0.04% (946) with in-hospital mortality as outcome. The presence of three criteria identified 98% of obstetric hospitalizations and 83% of obstetric hospitalizations with death as outcome. The comparison of mortality ratios between SIH (45.5 MMR; 95%CI 42.7 - 48.5) and SIM (49.7 MMR; 95%CI 46.7 - 52.8) was not statistically significant (p-value: 0.053). Conclusion: The analysis of SIH was able to provide additional information for the monitoring and surveillance of maternal health in Brazil. Although there are differences between the mortality rates, the SIH, as a complementary information system to the SIM, may be valid in studies on maternal mortality and morbidity.

Inquérito online sobre os motivos para hesitação vacinal contra a COVID-19 em crianças e adolescentes do Brasil / Online survey on the reasons for vaccine hesitancy against COVID-19 in children and adolescents in Brazil / Encuesta en línea sobre los motivos de la indecisión a las vacunas contra COVID-19 en niños y adolescentes de Brasil

Resumo: Objetiva-se desvelar os motivos para hesitação vacinal de pais e/ou responsáveis de crianças e adolescentes para prevenção da COVID-19. Trata-se de um estudo descritivo, de abordagem qualitativa, que busca analisar as respostas da pergunta aberta "por que você não vai vacinar, não vacinou ou está na dúvida em vacinar as crianças e os adolescentes sob sua responsabilidade para prevenção da COVID-19?". A pesquisa incluiu indivíduos adultos, brasileiros, residentes no país, responsáveis por crianças e adolescentes menores de 18 anos. A coleta de dados aconteceu de forma eletrônica entre os meses de novembro e dezembro de 2021. As respostas foram organizadas e processadas com suporte do software Iramuteq. O corpus textual desta pesquisa foi composto pela resposta de 1.896 participantes, constituído por 87% de hesitantes (1.650) e 13% (246) de pais que têm intenção de vacinar, mas que esboçaram algumas dúvidas e considerações a respeito da vacinação de crianças e adolescentes. São motivos pelos quais pais e/ou responsáveis não vacinaram ou estão na dúvida em vacinar as crianças e os adolescentes sob sua responsabilidade para prevenção da COVID-19: receio em razão de a vacina estar em fase experimental e medo das reações adversas e dos efeitos a longo prazo. Já os motivos para ausência de intenção de vacinar decorrem dos entendimentos dos participantes de que a COVID-19 em crianças não é grave, os riscos da vacinação são maiores do que os benefícios e o direito de escolha em não vacinar.

Abstract: The objective is to unveil the reasons for vaccine hesitancy among parents and/or guardians of children and adolescents toward the prevention of COVID-19. This is a descriptive study, with a qualitative approach that seeks to analyze the answers to the open question "Why will you not vaccinate or have not vaccinated or are in doubt about vaccinating the children and adolescents under your responsibility, for the prevention of COVID-19?". The research included adult individuals, Brazilians, living in the country, responsible for children and adolescents under 18 years of age. Data collection took place electronically in November and December 2021. The answers were organized and processed with the support of the software Iramuteq. The textual corpus of this research was composed of the response of 1,896 participants, consisting of 87% who were hesitant (1,650) and 13% (246) of parents who intend to vaccinate but who outlined some doubts and considerations about the vaccination of children and adolescents. These are reasons why parents and/or guardians have not vaccinated or are in doubt about vaccinating the children and adolescents under their responsibility for the prevention of COVID-19: fears about vaccination regarding the conception that the vaccine is in the experimental phase, fear of adverse reactions and long-term effects. The reasons for the lack of intention to vaccinate stem from the understanding of the participants that COVID-19 in children is not serious, the risks of vaccination are greater than the benefits, and the right of choice not to vaccinate.

Resumen: El objetivo es revelar los motivos de la indecisión a las vacunas de padres y/o responsables de niños y adolescentes para la prevención de COVID-19. Se trata de un estudio descriptivo con enfoque cualitativo, que busca analizar las respuestas a la pregunta abierta "¿Por qué no va a vacunar o no vacunó o tiene dudas en vacunar a los niños y los adolescentes bajo su responsabilidad para la prevención del COVID-19?". La investigación incluyó individuos adultos, brasileños, residentes en el país, responsables de niños y adolescentes menores de 18 años. La recolección de datos se realizó de forma electrónica entre los meses de noviembre y diciembre de 2021. Las respuestas se organizaron y procesaron con ayuda del software Iramuteq. El corpus textual de esta investigación fue compuesto por la respuesta de 1.896 participantes, siendo constituido por el 87% de indecisos (1.650) y el 13% (246) de padres que tienen la intención de vacunar, pero que esbozaron algunas dudas y consideraciones respecto a la vacunación de niños y adolescentes. Son motivos por los cuales los padres y/o responsables no vacunaron o están en duda en vacunar a los niños y adolescentes bajo su responsabilidad para prevención del COVID-19: temores con la vacunación en cuanto a la concepción de que la vacuna está en fase experimental, miedo a las reacciones adversas y los efectos a largo plazo. Los motivos de la ausencia de intención en vacunar se deben a que los participantes entienden que el COVID-19 en niños no es grave, que los riesgos de la vacunación son mayores que los beneficios y que tienen derecho a decidir no vacunarse.

Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on urinary incontinence and quality of life of nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of social isolation due to SARS-CoV-2 on the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and how this correlates with the quality of life of the nulliparous women evaluated. METHOD: Observational, longitudinal study, carried out from August/2019 to September/2020, at the Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi/RN, with 37 nulliparous women from 18 to 35 years old, who answered the socio-anthropometric assessment, to the Incontinence Severity Index Questionnaire and King's Health Questionnaire, before and during isolation due to SARS-CoV-2. Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Significance level p≤0.05. RESULTS: During social isolation, there was an improvement in urge incontinence (p=0.01) and in the frequency of urinary incontinence (p=0.03). The severity of urinary incontinence correlated with: general health perception (p=0.02; r=0.65); physical limitations (p=0.03; r=0.60); social (p=0.001; r=0.82). CONCLUSION: The social isolation from SARS-CoV-2 improved urge incontinence and frequency of urinary incontinence. The more severe the urinary incontinence, the worse the general health perception, physical and social limitations during isolation.

Repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on health professionals in the state of Rio de Janeiro / Brazil.

Brazil has been severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The high numbers of confirmed cases and deaths have continued unabated since the first reported case, with no flattening or downward turn in the curve. In this context, healthcare workers have been exposed uninterruptedly to stress factors throughout a year of the pandemic. The study´s aim was to identify and analyze healthcare workers´ perceptions of their feelings and concerns that have surfaced in responding to the pandemic. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional online qualitative survey study of 554 healthcare personnel working in the state of Rio de Janeiro during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recruitment occurred from July 20 to September 30, 2020, using an online survey, preceded byfree informed consent term. Data were analyzed with the Iramuteq software. RESULTS: Through a dendrogram, the words with the highest chi-square were highlighted and grouped into four classes: healthcare workers´ fear of falling ill to COVID-19 and infecting their family members; work/labor issues; feelings of powerlessness and need for public policies for government action; and fatigue and burnout in the pandemic. Each word class was also illustrated by a similarity tree. CONCLUSION: The study revealed healthcare workers´ exacerbated fear of infection and transmission of COVID-19 to their family members, besides financial losses and feelings of powerlessness and abandonment.

Estresse, qualidade de vida e copingem enfermeiros atuantes em uma unidade neonatal / Stress, quality of life and coping in nurses working in a neonatal unit / Estrés, calidad de vida y mecanismo de supervivenciaen enfermeros que trabajan en una unidad neonatal

Objetivo: Avaliar o estresse, qualidade de vida e relacionar com estratégias de enfrentamento em enfermeiros atuantes na unidade neonatal. Metodologia: estudo transversal do tipo descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa, no período de junho a novembro de 2020 na UTI Neonatal de uma instituiçãode Saúde no estado do Rio de Janeiro. Os participantes do estudo foram 17 enfermeiros plantonistas possuindo vínculo de trabalho que responderam três (3) questionários: Escala Bianchi de Stress ­EBS, World Health Organization Quality of Life -WHOQOL-bref e Inventário de Estratégias de Coping de Folkman e Lazarus. Resultados: De acordo com a classificação do estresse, todos os domínios apresentaram maior frequência de enfermeiros com nível de estresse médio. Os domínios C (atividades relacionadas à administração de pessoal), E (coordenação das atividades da unidade) e F (condições de trabalho para desempenho das atividades) também apresentaram enfermeiros com nível alto de estresse. O domínio F apresentou um percentual de 100% de respondentes classificando como estressor ­Entre os itens deste domínio, predominou o nível de ruído na unidade (29,8%) seguido de realizar tarefas com tempo mínimo disponível (29,6%) e o ambiente físico da unidade (27,9%). Quando perguntadas sobre como avaliariam a sua qualidade de vida, 52,9% das respondentes classificaram como boa. Somente 5,9% responderam como ruim.Conclusão: Os profissionais enfermeiros do estudo apresentam níveis médios e altos de estresse, entretanto, nãoafetaa qualidade de vida dos mesmos. Provavelmente porque diante do estresse a estratégia mais utilizada é a de fuga/esquiva.

Objective: To evaluate stress, quality of life and relate it to coping strategies in nurses working in the neonatal unit. Methodology: cross-sectional descriptive study, with a quantitative approach, from June to November 2020 in the neonatalICU of a Health institution in the state of Rio de Janeiro. The study participants were 17 nurses on duty with employment contract who answered three (3) questionnaires: Bianchi Stress Scale -EBS, World Health Organization Quality of Life -WHOQOL-bref and Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategies Inventory. Results: According to the stress classification, all domains had a higher frequency of nurses with medium stress level. Domains C (activities related to personnel administration), E (coordination of unit activities) and F (working conditions to perform activities) also presented nurses with a high level of stress. Domain F had a percentage of 100% of respondents classifying it as a stressor -Among the items in this domain, the noise level in the unit predominated (29.8%), followed by performing tasks with minimum available time (29.6%) and physical environment of the unit (27.9%). When asked how they would assess their quality of life, 52.9% of respondents rated it as good. Only 5.9% responded as bad. Conclusion: The study nurses have medium and high levels of stress, however, not affect their quality of life. Probably due to in the face of stress, the most used strategy is escape/avoidance.

Objetivo: Evaluar el estrés, la calidad de vida y relacionarlo con las estrategias de afrontamiento en enfermeros que actúan en la unidad neonatal. Metodología: estudio descriptivo transversal, con abordaje cuantitativo, de junio a noviembre de 2020 en la UTI Neonatal de una institución de salud del estado de Río de Janeiro. Los participantes del estudio fueron 17 enfermeros en turno que respondieron tres cuestionarios: Bianchi Stress Scale, World Health Organization Quality of Life y Folkman and Lazarus Coping Strategies Inventory. Resultados: De acuerdo con la clasificación del estrés, todos los dominios presentaron mayor frecuencia de enfermeros con nivel de estrés medio. Los dominios C (actividades relacionadas con la administración del personal), E (coordinación de las actividades de la unidad) y F (condiciones de trabajo para el desempeño de las actividades) también presentaron a los enfermeros con alto nivel de estrés. El dominio F presentó un porcentaje del 100% de los encuestados clasificándolo como estresor -Entre los ítems de este dominio, predominó el nivel de ruido en la unidad (29,8%), seguido de la realización de tareas con mínimo tiempo disponible (29,6%) y el ambiente físico de la unidad (27,9%). Cuando se les preguntó cómo calificarían su calidad de vida, el 52,9% de los encuestados la clasificó como buena. Solo el 5,9% respondió como malo. Conclusión: Los profesionales de enfermería del estudio presentan niveles medios y altos de estrés, sin embargo, no afecta su calidad de vida. Probablemente porque ante el estrés la estrategia más utilizada es la de escape/evitación.

Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on urinary incontinence and quality of life of nulliparous women / Impacto de la pandemia del SARS-CoV-2 en la incontinencia urinaria y la calidad de vida de mujeres nulíparas / Impacto da pandemia de SARS-CoV-2 na incontinência urinária e qualidade de vida de mulheres nulíparas

ABSTRACT Objectives: To evaluate the impact of social isolation due to SARS-CoV-2 on the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and how this correlates with the quality of life of the nulliparous women evaluated. Method: Observational, longitudinal study, carried out from August/2019 to September/2020, at the Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi/RN, with 37 nulliparous women from 18 to 35 years old, who answered the socio-anthropometric assessment, to the Incontinence Severity Index Questionnaire and King's Health Questionnaire, before and during isolation due to SARS-CoV-2. Statistical analysis: Wilcoxon test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Significance level p≤0.05. Results: During social isolation, there was an improvement in urge incontinence (p=0.01) and in the frequency of urinary incontinence (p=0.03). The severity of urinary incontinence correlated with: general health perception (p=0.02; r=0.65); physical limitations (p=0.03; r=0.60); social (p=0.001; r=0.82). Conclusion: The social isolation from SARS-CoV-2 improved urge incontinence and frequency of urinary incontinence. The more severe the urinary incontinence, the worse the general health perception, physical and social limitations during isolation.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Evaluar el impacto del aislamiento social debido al SARS-CoV-2 sobre la prevalencia y severidad de la incontinencia urinaria y cómo esto se correlaciona con la calidad de vida de las mujeres nulíparas evaluadas. Método: Estudio observacional, longitudinal, realizado de agosto/2019 a septiembre/2020, en la Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi/RN, con 37 mujeres nulíparas de 18 a 35 años, que respondieron la evaluación socio-antropométrica, al Incontinence Severity Index Questionaire y al King's Health Questionnaire, antes y durante el aislamiento por SARS-CoV-2. Análisis estadístico: prueba de Wilcoxon y coeficiente de correlación de Spearman. Nivel de significancia p≤0.05. Resultados: Durante el aislamiento social, hubo una mejora en la incontinencia de urgencia (p=0,01) y en la frecuencia de la incontinencia urinaria (p=0,03). La gravedad de la incontinencia urinaria se correlacionó con: percepción general de salud (p=0,02; r=0,65); limitaciones físicas (p=0,03; r=0,60); (p=0,001; r=0,82). Conclusión: El aislamiento social del SARS-CoV-2 mejoró la incontinencia de urgencia y la frecuencia de la incontinencia urinaria. Cuanto más grave es la incontinencia urinaria, peor es la percepción general de las limitaciones de salud, físicas y sociales durante el aislamiento.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto do isolamento social devido a SARS-CoV-2 na prevalência e gravidade da incontinência urinária e como isso se correlaciona com a qualidade de vida das mulheres nulíparas avaliadas. Métodos: Estudo observacional, longitudinal, realizado de agosto/2019 a setembro/2020, na Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde do Trairi/RN, com 37 nulíparas de 18 a 35 anos, que responderam a avaliação socioantropométrica, ao Incontinence Severity Index Questionaire e ao King's Health Questionnaire, antes e durante o isolamento devido a SARS-CoV-2. Análise estatística: Teste de Wilcoxon, e Coeficiente de Correlação de Spearman. Nível de significância p≤0,05. Resultados: Durante o isolamento social houve melhora na urgeincontinência (p=0,01) e na frequência da incontinência urinária (p=0,03). A gravidade da incontinência urinária teve correlação com: percepção geral de saúde (p=0,02; r=0,65); limitações físicas (p=0,03; r=0,60); sociais (p=0,001; r=0,82). Conclusão: O isolamento social da SARS-CoV-2 melhorou a urgeincontinência e frequência da incontinência urinária. Quanto mais grave a incontinência urinária pior a percepção geral de saúde, limitações físicas e sociais durante o isolamento.

Low COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire world, and the vaccine has emerged as a source of hope for return to normal life. Still, various countries have reported high vaccine hesitancy rates. It is important to know the vaccine hesitancy profile in Brazil to help design adequate communication strategies. METHODS: A voluntary, anonymous online survey was conducted from January 22 to 29, 2021, including resident Brazilian adults to assess factors related to vaccine hesitancy. Sociodemographic and epidemiological data were analyzed. A bivariate analysis was conducted with the independent variables, with vaccine hesitancy as the outcome variable, and a multivariate logistic model was used to calculated adjusted odds ratios. RESULTS: The sample included 173,178 respondents, and vaccine hesitancy was found in 10.5%. The principal factors associated with vaccine hesitancy were the following: assigning importance to the vaccinés efficacy (AOR = 16.39), fear of adverse reactions (AOR = 11.23), and assigning importance to the vaccinés country of origin (AOR = 3.72). Other risk factors were the following: male gender (AOR = 1.62), having children (AOR = 1.29), 9 years of schooling or less (AOR = 1.31), living in the Central-West region (AOR = 1.19), age ≥ 40 years (AOR = 1.17), and monthly income < U$788.68 (AOR = 1.13). The two vaccines available in Brazil, Covishield and CoronaVac, showed similar confidence, 80.13% and 76.36%, respectively, despite the higher rejection of the latter vaccinés Chinese origin. INTERPRETATION: This online survey confirms the low vaccine hesitancy rate among Brazilians and allowed the identification of a profile that can assist the elaboration of communication strategies to increase vaccine adherence. FUNDING: National Institute of Women, Children and Adolescents Health Fernandes Figueira, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Mães de recém-nascidos com malformação congênita externa: impacto emocional / Mothers of newborns with external congenital malformation: emotional impact / Madres de recién nacidos con malformación congénita externa: impacto emocional

INTRODUÇÃO: Um bebê com malformação (defeito num órgão ou parte do corpo) pode prejudicar o vínculo mãe/bebê. Investigou-se o impacto emocional em mães de recém-nascidos com malformação congênita (MF) externa. MÉTODO: Pesquisa qualitativa realizada num instituto de referência em alto risco fetal no RJ, a partir de entrevistas semiestruturadas com cinco mães, no pré-natal e 15 dias após o parto. A análise foi de conteúdo RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO: Diagnóstico da MF do filho durante a gestação: conflito entre a realidade invisível da malformação e o desejo da normalidade (forma como lidou com a notícia / o que esperar após o nascimento); visibilidade da MF: entre a fantasia e o real (concretização do diagnóstico); ambivalência no vínculo: preconceito e desejo de morte (sentimentos/desejos). CONCLUSÃO: Um bebê com MF externa influencia a formação do vínculo mãe/bebê, sendo necessário capacitar a equipe.

INTRODUCTION: A malformed baby (with defect in an organ or body part) can damage the mother/baby bond. We investigated the emotional impact experienced by mothers of newborns with external congenital malformation (MF). METHOD: Qualitative research carried out in a high fetal risk reference institute in Rio de Janeiro, based on semi-structured interviews with five mothers, in the prenatal and 15 days after delivery. The analysis was content. RESULTS: The diagnosis of the child's MF during pregnancy: the conflict between the invisible reality of the malformation and the desire for normality (how he dealt with the news/what to expect after birth); The visibility of MF: between fantasy and reality (concretion of the diagnosis); ambivalence in the bond: prejudice and death wish (feelings/desires). CONCLUSION: A baby with external MF influences the formation of the mother/baby bond, and it is necessary to train the team.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Un bebé con malformación (defecto en un órgano o parte del cuerpo) puede dañar el vínculo madre/bebé. Se investigó el impacto emocional experimentado por las madres de recién nacidos con malformación congénita (MF) externa. MÉTODO: Investigación cualitativa realizada en un instituto de referencia de alto riesgo fetal en Río de Janeiro, basada en entrevistas semiestructuradas con cinco madres, en el prenatal y 15 días después del parto. El análisis fue de contenido. RESULTADOS: Diagnóstico de la MF del hijo durante la gestación: conflicto entre la realidad invisible de la malformación y deseo de la normalidad (cómo manejó las noticias/qué esperar después del nacimiento); Visibilidad de la MF: entre fantasía y real (finalización del diagnóstico); Ambivalencia en vínculo: preconcepto y deseo de muerte (sentimientos/deseos). CONCLUSIÓN: Un bebé con MF externa influye en la formación del vínculo madre/bebé, y es necesario capacitar al equipo.

Avaliação da função dos músculos do assoalho pélvico e incontinência urinária em universitárias: um estudo transversal / Evaluación de la función de los músculos del suelo pélvico y la incontinencia urinaria en universitarias: un estudio transversal / Evaluation of pelvic-floor muscle function and urinary incontinence in college women: a cross-sectional study

RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a função e pressão de contração dos Músculos do Assoalho Pélvico (MAP) e a prevalência de Incontinência Urinária (IU) em universitárias. Realizou-se um estudo transversal, com universitárias entre 18 e 35 anos, nulíparas, que já tiveram relação sexual e que nunca realizaram tratamento fisioterapêutico para Disfunções dos Músculos do Assoalho Pélvico (DMAP). Todas as voluntárias realizaram a anamnese, responderam aos questionários international consultation on incontinence questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) e incontinence severity index questionaire (ISI-Q), e realizaram avaliação da função e manometria dos MAP. Foi utilizado o teste de Shapiro-Wilk e os valores da amostra são expressos em medianas, intervalos interquartílicos, frequências absolutas e relativas. Foram avaliadas 35 mulheres, das quais 65,72% apresentaram tônus normal, mas apenas 5,71% realizavam a contração adequada dos MAP, com medianas baixas para todas as etapas do PERFECT e na manometria dos MAP. A prevalência de IU foi 57,14%, sendo a Incontinência Urinária de Urgência (IUU) a queixa mais prevalente (50%) e com severidade moderada (55%). Este estudo permitiu identificar déficit na função dos MAP e altos índices de IU em universitárias, demostrando a importância de conscientizar esse público sobre essa DMAP.

RESUMEN El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la función y presión de contracción de los músculos del suelo pélvico (MSP) y la prevalencia de incontinencia urinaria (IU) en estudiantes universitarias. Se realizó un estudio transversal, con estudiantes universitarias entre 18 y 35 años, nulíparas, que ya habían tenido relaciones sexuales y que nunca se sometieron a tratamiento fisioterapéutico para las disfunciones musculares del suelo pélvico (DMSP). Todas las voluntarias realizaron anamnesis, respondieron al cuestionario de consulta internacional sobre incontinencia - formulario corto (ICIQ-SF) y al cuestionario de índice de severidad de la incontinencia (ISI-Q), y realizaron la evaluación de la función y la manometría de los MSP. Se utilizó la prueba de Shapiro-Wilk, y los valores muestrales se expresan en medianas, rangos intercuartílicos, frecuencias absolutas y relativas. Se evaluaron a 35 mujeres, de las cuales el 65,72% tenía tono normal, pero solo el 5,71% realizó la adecuada contracción de los MSP, con medianas bajas para todos los estadios de PERFECT y en la manometría de los MSP. La prevalencia de IU fue del 57,14%, siendo la incontinencia urinaria urgente (IUU) la queja más prevalente (50%) y de gravedad moderada (55%). Este estudio permitió identificar déficits en el papel de los MSP y altas tasas de IU en estudiantes universitarias, demostrando la importancia de concienciar a este público sobre el DMSP.

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the function and pressure of contraction of the Pelvic Floor Muscles (PFM) and the prevalence of Urinary Incontinence (UI) in university students. A cross-sectional study was conducted with nulliparous university students between 18 and 35 years old, who had already had sexual intercourse and never underwent physical therapy treatment for Pelvic Floor Muscle Disorders (PFMD). All volunteers underwent anamnesis, answered the International Consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form (ICIQ-SF) and the incontinence severity index questionnaire (ISI-Q), and had their PFM function and manometry evaluated. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used and the sample values are expressed in medians, interquartile ranges, absolute and relative frequencies. A total of 35 women were evaluated, 65.72% of whom had normal muscle tone, but only 5.71% performed adequate contraction of the PFM, with low medians for all stages of PERFECT and in the manometry of the PFM. The prevalence of UI was 57.14%, with Urgent Urinary Incontinence (UUI) being the most prevalent complaint (50%) and having moderate severity (55%). This study allowed to identify deficits in the role of PFM and high rates of UI in College Women, demonstrating the importance of making this public aware of this PFMD.

Estimating completeness of national and subnational death reporting in Brazil: application of record linkage methods.

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, both the Civil Registry (CR) and Ministry of Health (MoH) Mortality Information System (SIM) are sources of routine mortality data, but neither is 100% complete. Deaths from these two sources can be linked to facilitate estimation of completeness of mortality reporting and measurement of adjusted mortality indicators using generalized linear modeling (GLM). METHODS: The 2015 and 2016 CR and SIM data were linked using deterministic methods. GLM with covariates of the deceased's sex, age, state of residence, cause of death and place of death, and municipality-level education decile and population density decile, was used to estimate total deaths and completeness nationally, subnationally and by population sub-group, and to identify the characteristics of unreported deaths. The empirical completeness method and Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 estimates were comparators at the national and state level. RESULTS: Completeness was 98% for SIM and 95% for CR. The vast majority of deaths in Brazil were captured by either system and 94% were reported by both sources. For each source, completeness was lowest in the north. SIM completeness was consistently high across all sub-groups while CR completeness was lowest for deaths at younger ages, outside facilities, and in the lowest deciles of municipality education and population density. There was no clear municipality-level relationship in SIM and CR completeness, suggesting minimal dependence between sources. The empirical completeness method model 1 and GBD completeness estimates were each, on average, less than three percentage points different from GLM estimates at the state level. Life expectancy was lowest in the northeast and 7.5 years higher in females than males. CONCLUSIONS: GLM using socio-economic and demographic covariates is a valuable tool to accurately estimate completeness from linked data sources. Close scrutiny of the quality of variables used to link deaths, targeted identification of unreported deaths in poorer, northern states, and closer coordination of the two systems will help Brazil achieve 100% death reporting completeness. The results also confirm the validity of the empirical completeness method.

Procedimentos dolorosos agudos no recém-nascido pré-termo em uma unidade neonatal / Acute painful procedures pain in the preterm newborn in a neonatal unit / Procedimientos dolorosos agudos en el recién nacido pre-término en una unidad neonatal

Objetivo: analisar o número de procedimentos dolorosos agudos e manejo da dor em recém-nascidos pré-termo em uma unidade neonatal. Método: estudo descritivo, transversal. Teve como campo uma unidade neonatal de uma instituição pública de saúde. Os participantes da pesquisa foram recém-nascidos abaixo de 35 semanas. Resultados: foram incluídos 17 recémnascidos. Foi quantificado um total de 729 procedimentos dolorosos. Em média foram realizados 42,9 procedimentos por recém-nascido durante os primeiros 14 dias de vida, sendo aproximadamente três procedimentos realizados por bebê no serviço diurno. Dentre os procedimentos, o mais frequente foi a punção de calcâneo (23,9%). O manejo predominante foi a contenção facilitada (32,7%). A (re)inserção de pronga foi o segundo procedimento mais realizado. Conclusões: O estudo permitiu apreender que o manejo da dor no recém-nascido pré-termo internado em uma unidade neonatal ainda é um desafio

Objective: to analyze the number of acute painful procedures and pain management in preterm infants in a neonatal unit. Method: a cross-sectional and descriptive study. It was conducted in a neonatal unit of a public health institution. The newborns younger than 35 weeks were the participants in the survey. Results: seventeen preterm newborns were included. A total of 729 painful procedures were quantified. On average, 42.9 procedures per newborn were performed during the first 14 days of birth, and approximately three procedures performed per day service by child. The most common procedure was the hell-stick (23.9%). The predominant management was facilitated tucking (32.7%). The CPAP prongs insertion/reinsertion was the second most performed procedure. Conclusions: The present study showed that the management of pain in the preterm newborns in a neonatal unit is strongly neglected by the professionals

Objetivo: analizar el número de procedimientos dolorosos agudos y manejo del dolor en recién nacidos prematuros en una unidad neonatal. Método: estudio descriptivo, transversal. Tuvo como campo una unidad neonatal de una institución pública de salud. Los participantes de la investigación fueron recién nacidos por debajo de 35 semanas. Resultados: se incluyeron 17 recién nacidos. Se cuantificó un total de 729 procedimientos dolorosos. En promedio se realizaron 42,9 procedimientos por recién nacido durante los primeros 14 días de vida, siendo acerca de tres procedimientos realizados por bebé en el servicio diurno. Entre los procedimientos, el más frecuente fue la punción de calcáneo (23,9%). El manejo predominante fue la contención facilitada (32,7%). La (re) inserción de prong fue el segundo procedimiento más realizado. Conclusiones: El estudio permitió aprehender que el manejo del dolor en el recién nacidos prematuros internado en una unidad neonatal se muestra fuertemente descuidado por el equipo.